Foxconn H61MD/H61MD-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn H61MD/H61MD-V  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131220
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 25 '22 at 13:28
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 70
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 135
57% 95.6 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 180
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Device(107D 2735) 512MB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.3 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK66.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 126 120 95 51 65 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25% Poor
Read 120
Write 94.3
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 106
22% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 10.3
43% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 12.8
DQ Write 17.9
DQ Mixed 14.8
11% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
295GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 97 98 96 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 102
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 96.7
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905458-017. 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MD/H61MD-V Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H61MD/H61MD-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback