TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime10.6 Days
Run DateOct 25 '22 at 06:40
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 212
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 435
49% 385 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 71.5%
 Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1332) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9676
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.4% Average
Lighting 56.1
Reflection 61.7
Parallax 51.1
46% 56.3 fps
MRender 42.6
Gravity 50
Splatting 48.9
39% 47.2 fps
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 43.4%
 Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 246 237 222 216 297 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 819
Write 228
Mixed 347
SusWrite 262
91% 414 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 32.4
121% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 495
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 434
313% 408 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 153%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
199GB free
Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1071 727 711 747 715 729 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,501
Write 1,713
Mixed 1,583
SusWrite 783
314% 1,395 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 45.1
149% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 880
DQ Write 645
DQ Mixed 702
541% 742 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑
This bench: 188%
 Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 859B CT8G4SFRA266.M8FRS 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.8% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 49.8%
 Great: 85%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 11,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples5,749x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples2,894x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples2,689x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples6,031x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples3,496x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples946x
SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples1,222x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 188%, 4,220 samples1,039x
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GBKingstonBench 126%, 5,630 samples747x
RAM
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 2,420 samples855x
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 4,751 samples761x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples736x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback