Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca) 12,494 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Memory 37.8 1-Core 27.3 2-Core 48.6 24% 37.9 Pts	4-Core 75.9 8-Core 89.2 11% 82.6 Pts	64-Core 90.5 6% 90.5 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 19,746 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 82F6) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.98% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 3.6 2% 3.3 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 4.1 3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.98% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB 5,968 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: HCS1A25C SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 269 274 290 73 318 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Read 372 Write 296 Mixed 209 SusWrite 222 61% 275 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 9.7 59% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 16.7 44% 95.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 8GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.8 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 213 19% 213 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 4,472 samples	40x
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	26x
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	6x

SSD
MZNLN256HMHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 91%, 5,596 samples	7x
SD8SNAT-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 2,836 samples	3x
MZNLF128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 46%, 3,641 samples	2x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 1x4GBMicronBench 19%, 3,980 samples	11x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	8x
AM1L16BC8R2-B1XS 1x8GBAdataBench 22%, 2,239 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16