HP p6-2017es

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6-2017es  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory1.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110823
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 23 '22 at 14:05
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$189
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 163
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 420
44% 353 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530
Device(1B0A 90A3) 2GB
CLim: 699 MHz, MLim: 396 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.63 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.2
3% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK66C5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 234 227 102 70 69 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65% Good
Read 244
Write 108
Mixed 219
SusWrite 151
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 32.8
120% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 155
129% 187 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR1810EC58E8F1333 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2017es Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2017es

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback