Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) 5,170 User benchmarks, average bench 29% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Memory 9.77 1-Core 20.3 2-Core 49.8 14% 26.6 Pts	4-Core 73.8 8-Core 77.5 10% 75.7 Pts	64-Core 70 4% 70 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 4,472 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 81B3) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	1.59% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 2.7 1% 2.63 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 3.2 2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.59% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 594GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPH3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 58 106 138 148 137 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	69% Good	Read 126 Write 146 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 115 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 CT102464BD160B.C16 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	7.54% Terrible	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.57 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 3.1 6% 2.13 GB/s	Latency 406 10% 406 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.54% Great: 17%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	29	20	60	27"	1280 720	PHLC07D 273ELH

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM