Lenovo 3129B2G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive12.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3129B2G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120214
Uptime14.2 Days
Run DateOct 23 '22 at 12:40
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 108
53% 84.2 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 173
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 4.3
3% 4 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 53 44 38 38 48 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.6% Very poor
Read 23.7
Write 78.2
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 47.7
9% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 7
29% 7.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 86%
Adata SU630 240GB
213GB free
Firmware: V8X01c87
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 209 206 206 219 221 MB/s
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.7% Above average
Read 246
Write 224
Mixed 207
SusWrite 210
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 23.7
86% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 182
133% 171 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3129B2G Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3129B2G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback