Asrock Z68 Professional Gen3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Professional Gen3  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '17 at 19:22
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 218
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 428
54% 408 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0112) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 3.23
Parallax 1.41
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Asus(1043 8387) 1.2GB
CLim: 742 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 369.9
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
21.1% Poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 38.5
Parallax 28.2
20% 30.5 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 26
23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Pyro 120GB
75GB free
Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39% Below average
Read 214
Write 120
Mixed 165
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 9.54
72% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 83.6
DQ Mixed 11.4
22% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 39%
Great: 75%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 386
Write 179
Mixed 223
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 10
57% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.1
DQ Write 50.7
DQ Mixed 9.77
15% 27.5 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 76%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68% Good
Read 120
Write 117
Mixed 93.7
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 0.27
96% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68%
Great: 88%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$54
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 103
Write 77.7
Mixed 83.9
66% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.18
57% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
803GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
69% Good
Read 128
Write 112
Mixed 25.5
64% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 2.24
4K Mixed 0.43
129% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69%
Great: 76%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
337GB free, PID 8561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 101
Write 105
Mixed 76.5
120% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.44
96% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%
WDC WD32 00BEKT-60F3T1 320GB
298GB free, PID 8561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.1% Below average
Read 78.9
Write 75.4
Mixed 66.6
94% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.32
80% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Professional Gen3 Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Professional Gen3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $619
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback