Lenovo 10M8S7VF00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemLenovo 10M8S7VF00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3102
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '22 at 05:49
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 153
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 244
29% 222 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 3102) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 3.8
2% 3.8 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 64 64 66 64 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.1% Below average
Read 52.7
Write 111
Mixed 196
SusWrite 65.3
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 1.2
80% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 73.7
69% 108 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
431GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 172 182 182 185 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 179
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 182
112% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 105%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5110KE68H9F-2400 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
69.8% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.6
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 19.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10M8S7VF00 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10M8S7VF00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback