Alienware m15 R7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware m15 R7  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0DJVK7
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220809
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateOct 21 '22 at 09:13
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 63.5
1-Core 184
2-Core 346
102% 198 Pts
4-Core 685
8-Core 1,062
108% 873 Pts
64-Core 1,951
121% 1,951 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Dell(1028 0B54) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1298
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 187
Parallax 28.6
20% 79.7 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 35.6
Splatting 21.2
22% 27.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PC SN810 WDC 512GB
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61520012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,676
Write 3,790
Mixed 2,656
821% 3,707 MB/s
4K Read 82.4
4K Write 285
4K Mixed 107
412% 158 MB/s
DQ Read 1,594
DQ Write 1,260
DQ Mixed 1,382
1,047% 1,412 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 463%
Nvme SPCC M.2 PCIE SSD 512GB
420GB free
Firmware: V0513A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1584 1585 1585 1588 1535 1580 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1,647
Write 1,524
Mixed 1,149
SusWrite 1,576
332% 1,474 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 238
4K Mixed 33.3
244% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 793
DQ Write 1,144
DQ Mixed 540
528% 825 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 275%
Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD5S480016G-B 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 32.3
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 20.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical m15 R7 Builds (Compare 1,739 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Alienware m15 R7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback