Colorful CVN B560M GAMING FROZEN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 191%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 190%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemColorful CVN B560M GAMING FROZEN  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful CVN B560M GAMING FROZEN
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220713
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 21 '22 at 00:55
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$226
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 270
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 906
85% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,421
88% 1,421 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
214% Outstanding
Lighting 316
Reflection 298
Parallax 334
258% 316 fps
MRender 358
Gravity 253
Splatting 192
211% 268 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 214%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 500GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S1369 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,141
Write 1,651
Mixed 1,312
377% 1,702 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 49.2
182% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 806
DQ Mixed 520
402% 529 MB/s
Poor: 136% Great: 319%
AS-512 512GB
460GB free
Firmware: HPS1A30C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 325 443 453 453 452 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 478
Write 457
Mixed 395
SusWrite 407
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 13.8
118% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 16.5
78% 172 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Asgard VMA45UG-MEC1U2AW2 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 24.1
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 26.3
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CVN B560M GAMING FROZEN Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO

System: Colorful CVN B560M GAMING FROZEN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $721
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback