Notebook W65KJ1_KK1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNotebook W65KJ1_KK1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65KJ1_KK1
Memory10.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161223
Uptime10.2 Days
Run DateOct 20 '22 at 21:10
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 100
2-Core 192
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 273
41% 300 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Clevo(1558 651A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4678
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.56% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 40
Parallax 6.1
5% 17.5 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 10.1
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.56%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 128 169 147 155 177 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 782
Write 571
Mixed 181
SusWrite 172
94% 426 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 13.5
53% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 53.8
69% 122 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 182%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
928GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 92 97 102 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 106
Write 96.5
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 97.9
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC Kingston KCRXJ6-MIE 20GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.8% Average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 12.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 8
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65KJ1_KK1 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65KJ1_KK1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $31
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback