MSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C36
MotherboardMSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220318
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateOct 20 '22 at 20:29
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 1,088
98% 826 Pts
64-Core 2,164
134% 2,164 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Gainward(10B0 17C8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1496 MHz, MLim: 1785 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.1% Very good
Lighting 85.4
Reflection 112
Parallax 95.3
70% 97.5 fps
MRender 96.6
Gravity 88.6
Splatting 87.8
74% 91 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,508
Write 2,398
Mixed 1,796
497% 2,234 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 68.3
234% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 1,056
DQ Write 644
DQ Mixed 874
645% 858 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
163GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 138 146 142 148 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75% Very good
Read 120
Write 96.6
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 141
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 33.7
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 31.4
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36) Builds (Compare 344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $1,610
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback