MSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C36
MotherboardMSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 09:11
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 80.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 290
85% 160 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 1103
99% 838 Pts
64-Core 2,198
136% 2,198 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Gainward(10B0 17C8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.1% Very good
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 104
Parallax 92.9
75% 96.6 fps
MRender 91.5
Gravity 90.3
Splatting 82.3
72% 88 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,225
Write 1547
Mixed 1,787
411% 1,853 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 76.2
249% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,048
DQ Write 662
DQ Mixed 876
648% 862 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$83
212GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 322 329 331 326 329 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 364
Write 321
Mixed 326
SusWrite 317
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 43.9
143% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 198
151% 205 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
180GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 143 146 152 149 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 132
Write 85.7
Mixed 79
SusWrite 146
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 112%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 256GB-$126
35GB free, PID 16b3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 2.8 2.5 2.7 1.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 145
Write 9
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 2.8
33% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 99%
TS-RDF5A Transcend 64GB
59GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 72 62 77 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 91.5
Write 78.6
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 70.6
84% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 4
190% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 34.6
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 33.3
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36) Builds (Compare 344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback