Getac F110G6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemGetac F110G6  (all builds)
MotherboardGETAC F110G6
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220722
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 20 '22 at 15:05
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
CUU5A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 50.6
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 154
57% 101 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 517
54% 433 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1071 E207) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9749
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 13.4
10% 12.8 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 9.3
12% 15 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CA5-8D256 256GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQ25104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 530 656 366 333 337 330 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 895
Write 888
Mixed 631
SusWrite 425
159% 710 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 48.6
170% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 794
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 622
437% 566 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 138%
Great: 232%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD32D4S2S8MF-16 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
38.7% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 12.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F110G6 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Getac F110G6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback