Alienware Aurora R13

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive461% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora R13  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0JJFMD
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '22 at 12:30
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900KF-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 79.2
1-Core 210
2-Core 418
121% 236 Pts
4-Core 836
8-Core 1,627
146% 1,232 Pts
64-Core 2,966
184% 2,966 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
Dell(1028 C890) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.77
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 269
Reflection 246
Parallax 276
219% 263 fps
Gravity 222
Splatting 167
168% 195 fps
Poor: 163% Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D512-Q11 SSSTC 512GB
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 24201114 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1407 2603 2628 3678 3657 3647 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
461% Outstanding
Read 2,980
Write 202
Mixed 349
SusWrite 2,936
356% 1,617 MB/s
4K Read 84.3
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 89.5
334% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,700
DQ Write 996
DQ Mixed 1,558
1,103% 1,418 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 461%
Great: 375%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 200 207 209 210 202 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 119
Write 168
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 205
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
220% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown XKHFXM-MIA-A 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
156% Outstanding
MC Read 63.9
MC Write 60
MC Mixed 57.8
173% 60.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 52.5
SC Mixed 29.5
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 133%
This bench: 156%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora R13 Builds (Compare 898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 251%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R13

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback