Matech AP8B75-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMatech AP8B75-M  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8B75-M
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '22 at 00:44
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 195
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 472
51% 405 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.8% Average
Lighting 58.7
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 83.6
48% 68.3 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 47.2
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 66 19 11 10 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 62.1
Write 14.2
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 31.9
31% 40.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 60%
Lenovo USB Hard Drive 250GB
38GB free, PID 4533
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 81 80 81 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 70.1
Write 76.2
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 81.3
94% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AP8B75-M Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Matech AP8B75-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback