HP h8-1503

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemHP h8-1503  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory3 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime60.1 Days
Run DateOct 18 '22 at 23:32
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 74
2-Core 139
60% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 327
36% 287 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 4.2
3% 4 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 417
Write 412
Mixed 343
87% 391 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 35.2
117% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 295
217% 289 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 160
Write 178
Mixed 28.5
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 110%
HP Officejet Pro 8GB
6GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11.4
Write 4.5
Mixed 5.5
8% 7.13 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
WD My Passport 1.5TB
101GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 76.5
Write 78.4
Mixed 42.7
82% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 44%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB
58GB free, PID ce15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 34.7
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 37
44% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 8502 PSD34G160081 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6D1 14GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1503 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1503

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback