Asus M4N72-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4N72-E  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110414
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 18 '22 at 21:58
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T-$165
AM2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 78.4
42% 63.4 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 218
24% 187 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2304) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.10.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.6% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 67.6
35% 57 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 54.2
Splatting 43.7
42% 52.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
464GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 72 76 77 64 66 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.5% Above average
Read 188
Write 68.8
Mixed 169
SusWrite 70
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 38.4
123% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 39.6
DQ Write 95.6
DQ Mixed 57.9
47% 64.4 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB
517GB free
Firmware: JEDOA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 77 77 77 67 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 75.3
Write 79.5
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 73.1
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 8.4
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N72-E Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N72-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback