Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '17 at 01:03
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 71
2-Core 142
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 361
40% 315 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
BFG(19F1 0DBA) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
7.2% Terrible
Lighting 9.13
Reflection 8.88
Parallax 2.72
7% 6.91 fps
MRender 9.43
Gravity 8.53
Splatting 7.13
7% 8.36 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.2%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$160
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
3.5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 154
Write 118
Mixed 13.6
104% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.57
274% 7.22 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 112
Write 117
Mixed 9.8
92% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 14
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10.4
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback