| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | To Intel X79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20220119 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 18 '22 at 05:52 |
| Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
|
68.6%
Good
|
57% 94.4 Pts
|
52% 425 Pts
|
49% 792 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
19.6%
Very poor
|
19% 25.4 fps
|
21% 26.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apacer AS2280P2 120GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP120PG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 406 82 63 60 58 MB/s
|
82%
Excellent
|
95% 429 MB/s
|
93% 31.3 MB/s
|
219% 316 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
476GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 223 227 240 241 242 MB/s
|
62%
Good
|
52% 233 MB/s
|
95% 30.2 MB/s
|
148% 197 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
219GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 224 227 241 241 242 MB/s
|
65.2%
Good
|
52% 230 MB/s
|
104% 32.9 MB/s
|
148% 198 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.9%
Poor
|
26% 8.93 GB/s
|
25% 8.73 GB/s
|
49% 82 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,987 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: To Intel X79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 505x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 217x |
| Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples | 96x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 145x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 113x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 93x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $158 |