Acer Aspire M3910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire M3910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M3910
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100517
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateOct 18 '22 at 02:23
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Memory 19.3
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 46.6
17% 29.9 Pts
4-Core 78.3
8-Core 101
11% 89.8 Pts
64-Core 91.8
6% 91.8 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 61.5
Write 44.4
Mixed 36.6
35% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 70%
Samsung STORY Station 2TB
2TB free, PID 5f07
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 20 22 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
7.51% Terrible
Read 18.9
Write 19.7
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 20.6
26% 19 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
11% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 7.51%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.2
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 2.6
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 326
12% 326 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3910 Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback