HP 870-189na

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics94.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 870-189na  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateOct 17 '22 at 22:46
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 197
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 561
57% 460 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
HP(103C 82FA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.5% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 129
Parallax 119
96% 122 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 124
Splatting 109
92% 113 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB7S-512G-1006 512GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 205 141 35 51 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 399
Write 351
Mixed 237
SusWrite 116
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 27.2
97% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 171
158% 245 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
2TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 136 138 136 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 126
Write 85.1
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 138
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP24D4U7S8MBP-8 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.4% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 24.7
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 23
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-189na Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer

System: HP 870-189na

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback