Fujitsu UH-X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive97.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu UH-X  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2E0
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '22 at 16:04
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 68.1
1-Core 136
2-Core 244
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 549
59% 467 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1E26 0050) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 22.3
16% 20.6 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 1.4
6% 7.77 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HALB-00007 1TB
499GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7202Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 161 179 159 176 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 870
Write 451
Mixed 307
SusWrite 168
99% 449 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 32.7
115% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 706
DQ Write 58.8
DQ Mixed 310
244% 358 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 201%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 56.8
MC Mixed 41.1
130% 45.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 13.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 115%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UH-X Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu UH-X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback