Casper EXCALIBUR G770

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G770  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER NLAI 001
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200914
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateOct 16 '22 at 12:54
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 129
2-Core 220
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 620
64% 513 Pts
64-Core 702
43% 702 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Quanta(152D 1246) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.3% Below average
Lighting 48.8
Reflection 56.4
Parallax 52.8
40% 52.7 fps
MRender 52.7
Gravity 49.2
Splatting 41.5
38% 47.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 47%
Intel UHD Graphics
Quanta(152D 1244) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 7.4
5% 24.5 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 11.5
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 45 40 80 39 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 325
Write 120
Mixed 333
SusWrite 53.3
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 31.3
115% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 88.5
DQ Mixed 18.9
58% 132 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 91%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB
451GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 83 79 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
60% Good
Read 124
Write 142
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 83.3
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.6
232% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.7% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 8.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 7.9
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EXCALIBUR G770 Builds (Compare 3,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $45
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback