Mikrolog POWER-Z77 IT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMikrolog POWER-Z77 IT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8Z77-V LE PLUS
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 16 '22 at 09:28
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 172
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 478
50% 401 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 0442) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.7% Below average
Lighting 44.5
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 54.4
36% 43.1 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 45.1
Splatting 22.7
26% 32.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 76 78 78 79 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 331
Write 138
Mixed 189
SusWrite 80
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 22
76% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 127
95% 126 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
744GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 194 191 193 194 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 181
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 194
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POWER-Z77 IT Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

System: Mikrolog POWER-Z77 IT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $528
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback