Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX  (all builds)
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 16 '22 at 04:30
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User EUR-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 112
52% 82.5 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 222
26% 202 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Device(4D50 4449) ≥ 4GB; Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 172
Parallax 168
124% 164 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 136
Splatting 124
118% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 117%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF22
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 388
Write 311
Mixed 274
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 12.9
52% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 28.7
DQ Write 55.9
DQ Mixed 32
27% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 56%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
104GB free
Firmware: GR2O
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 74.7
Write 73.7
Mixed 29.2
43% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 58%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
55GB free
Firmware: SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 71.8
Write 64.8
Mixed 49.1
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.4
125% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 95%
303GB free
Firmware: 0101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26.4
Write 27
Mixed 24.9
20% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
203% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 106%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
1TB free
Firmware: 82.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 113
Write 112
Mixed 83.4
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
587GB free
Firmware: 0101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 56.5
Write 18.9
Mixed 22
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 106%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1707
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18.7
Write 25.5
Mixed 26.9
18% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.5
144% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A160 CT2K102464BD1 CMZ8GX3M2A160 CT2K102464BD1 24GB
667, 800, 667, 800 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 14.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 10.6
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P FX Builds (Compare 430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback