Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '22 at 22:49
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4771-$129
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 188
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 527
53% 431 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X04c13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 356 370 366 365 366 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 405
Write 358
Mixed 333
SusWrite 361
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 30.4
106% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 148
119% 165 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 101%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
698GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 111 109 111 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 95.1
Write 101
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 110
65% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 18.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 5,111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback