Lenovo 4384FF3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 4384FF3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4384FF3
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '17 at 16:09
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 121
52% 87 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 173
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 215A) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.64% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.88
Parallax 0.66
0% 0.74 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.35
1% 0.98 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.64%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNC128GCSJ 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CJLA0201 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 168
Write 161
Mixed 139
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 7.54
36% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 11.7
DQ Write 28.8
DQ Mixed 5.67
8% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 48%
Generic 5$CGP SD Card 32GB
29GB free
Firmware: 0.8
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.2% Very poor
Read 22.7
Write 14.2
Mixed 19.2
14% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.51
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.8
337% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1600, 1334 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.5
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4384FF3 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4384FF3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback