Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory17.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120803
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateOct 15 '22 at 05:02
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 187
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 344
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Asus(1043 86BD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.2% Good
Lighting 82.8
Reflection 80.4
Parallax 71.7
68% 78.3 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 72.9
Splatting 65.9
55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 336 2.5 1.8 5.5 8.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 401
Write 336
Mixed 363
SusWrite 80.9
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 22.8
99% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 0.9
81% 192 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
66GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 103 103 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 122
Write 101
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 98.8
73% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML16GX3M2A1600C10 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML16GX3M2A1600C10 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19.1
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $902
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback