Zoostorm 7200-8002A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemZoostorm 7200-8002A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H81M-K
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '22 at 17:04
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 157
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 218
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 510
Nvidia(10DE 0967) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 4.2
3% 3.5 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 4.2
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS120G2G0A- 120GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 418
Write 192
Mixed 221
207% 277 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 9.6
1,787% 9.83 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 153%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
283GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 79 81 84 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 97
Write 70.2
Mixed 58
SusWrite 83.4
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial ST51264BA160B.16FM 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
30.4% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-8002A Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Zoostorm 7200-8002A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $344
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback