Gigabyte GA-B660 DS3H DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B660 DS3H DDR4  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '22 at 15:46
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 76
1-Core 168
2-Core 313
99% 186 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 782
95% 727 Pts
64-Core 1,209
75% 1,209 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 98%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
Gigabyte(1458 4073) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 121
Parallax 124
107% 126 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 108
Splatting 93.1
90% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,134
Write 2,271
Mixed 1528
441% 1,978 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 91.9
302% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,013
DQ Write 1,114
DQ Mixed 1,170
851% 1,099 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
11GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 56 93 90 93 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 50.5
Write 69.8
Mixed 42
SusWrite 81.1
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.M16FB CT8G4DFS824A.M8FE 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 28.4
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 21.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 82%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B660 DS3H DDR4 Builds (Compare 1,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B660 DS3H DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback