Asrock H170A-X1

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H170A-X1 (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160520
Uptime	3.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '22 at 14:21
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 99.8 2-Core 193 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 483 53% 421 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55% Above average	Lighting 67.7 Reflection 72.6 Parallax 66.3 55% 68.9 fps	MRender 64 Gravity 69.3 Splatting 66.6 55% 66.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 448 Write 436 Mixed 364 93% 416 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 47 150% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 337 253% 339 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
OCZ AGILITY3 128GB 513 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 73GB free Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 100 105 105 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 158 Write 126 Mixed 137 SusWrite 101 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 69.9 4K Mixed 30.1 109% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 127 98% 134 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 190 198 198 200 190 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 129 Mixed 85.8 SusWrite 194 109% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB-$42 16,658 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.5% Good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 20.1 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 21.7 SC Mixed 13.2 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170A-X1 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H170A-X1

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	35x
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	11x
Core i5-6600Intel $133Bench 68%, 80,688 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	21x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	7x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	6x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	4x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
2400 C15 Series 2x4GBUnknownBench 74%, 4,971 samples	4x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	4x
HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 3x4GBKingstonBench 59%, 654 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $219

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16