Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory16.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '22 at 03:24
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 81.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 250
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 763
77% 626 Pts
64-Core 976
60% 976 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.8% Good
Lighting 93.1
Reflection 88.2
Parallax 76.9
76% 86.1 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 78.5
Splatting 70.4
58% 70.6 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 58 4.7 62 71 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 91%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
37GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 63 122 116 43 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 82GB-$33
1GB free
Firmware: PF2OA69A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 163
Write 40.3
Mixed 64
66% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.9
430% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 32%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
73GB free
Firmware: 12.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 48 48 47 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 61%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
261GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 63 62 60 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 63
Write 57.8
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 60.9
44% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
612GB free
Firmware: MN6OA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 82 84 75 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 85%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69
210GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 76 76 73 75 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 61%
Asmt 2115 100GB
8GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 27 27 26 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 28
Write 37.8
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 26.2
25% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
267% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 20%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 839 177 175 180 173 170 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 37
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 34.2
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $645
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback