ONDA H310CD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemONDA H310CD3  (all builds)
MotherboardONDA H310CD3
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateOct 13 '22 at 20:18
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 82.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 628
68% 542 Pts
64-Core 647
40% 647 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2200 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (72 fps cap detected)
58.1% Above average
Lighting 71.8
Reflection 73
Parallax 67.2
58% 70.7 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 72.8
Splatting 66.9
57% 70.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 95.7
Write 89.7
Mixed 64.3
62% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
144GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 132 131 136 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 118
Write 131
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 132
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
7GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 143
Write 148
Mixed 79.4
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
85GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 100 105 100 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 154
Write 125
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 101
151% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.6
311% 3.43 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 0.5
365% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 65%
WD My Passport 259F 1TB
44GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 50.3
Write 39.7
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 40
52% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.1% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 14.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CD3 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: ONDA H310CD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback