Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X412FAC
Memory	5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200717
Uptime	20.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '22 at 16:50
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	38%
CPU Throttled	83%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10110U 11,481 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	36.4% Below average	Memory 70.1 1-Core 98.7 2-Core 179 66% 116 Pts	4-Core 16.6 8-Core 232 12% 124 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 110,580 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1DE1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.69% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1.8 5% 2.93 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 9.2 5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.69% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 26,870 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 143 210 224 202 221 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 719 Write 247 Mixed 312 SusWrite 205 82% 371 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 71 4K Mixed 27.3 109% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 471 DQ Write 81.5 DQ Mixed 131 133% 228 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 153%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATE51264HZ-2G6E1 0949 V01D4S88GB1G81G82666 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2800, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.6% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 11.9 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 12.3 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA

CPU
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 53%, 54,859 samples	52x
Core i3-10110UIntelBench 47%, 11,481 samples	42x
Core i7-10510UIntelBench 56%, 51,080 samples	3x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	97x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	63x
HFM256GDJTNG-831 256GBNvmeBench 128%, 3,461 samples	14x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $58Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	3x

RAM
4ATE51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 37%, 121 samples	24x
4ATE51264HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 61%, 102 samples	22x
4ATE51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 62%, 66 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369