TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 10A6S0W703

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics82.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10A6S0W703  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory15.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '22 at 12:06
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 96
2-Core 190
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 321
41% 309 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 65.2%
 Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Nvidia(10DE 1F03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.6% Excellent
Lighting 97.5
Reflection 133
Parallax 88.9
80% 106 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 113
Splatting 91.4
88% 111 fps
Poor: 86% ↑
This bench: 82.6%
 Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB
230GB free
Firmware: FW201219
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 321 335 346 355 359 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 439
Write 348
Mixed 326
SusWrite 294
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 12.1
112% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 20
66% 139 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 75.8%
 Great: 211%
SSD 240GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 122 108 54 68 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 411
Write 337
Mixed 310
SusWrite 103
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 29.3
119% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 163
148% 221 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 70.1%
 Great: 95%
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB
232GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 85.8
Write 97.5
Mixed 60
SusWrite 94.5
62% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 51.9%
 Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-062.A00LF 9905474-062.A00LF Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 9905474-062.A00LF 20GB
1333, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 41% ↑
This bench: 44%
 Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 10A6S0W703 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10A6S0W703

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel  $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples13x
Core i7-4770Intel  $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples4x
Core i3-4130Intel  $41Bench 52%, 49,509 samples2x
GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples4x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples3x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples2x
SSD
512GB 512GBSSDBench 87%, 6,819 samples2x
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $58Bench 45%, 156,194 samples2x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 96%, 217,115 samples2x
RAM
CT102464BD186D.M16 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 308 samples3x
KP223C-ELD 1311 M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 1313 Princeton 8GBKingstonBench 34%, 2 samples2x
HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 10GBHynixBench 37%, 3 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback