HP 700-567nz

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemHP 700-567nz  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B36
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150520
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 13 '22 at 03:48
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 213
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 550
60% 475 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1604 MHz, MLim: 1871 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 49.2
Parallax 44
39% 46.9 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 43.9
Splatting 38.8
33% 40.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1209A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 32 52 62 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 484
Write 413
Mixed 401
SusWrite 74.8
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 23.8
135% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 7.7
57% 128 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
84GB free
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 71 70 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 112
Write 101
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 70.5
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-567nz Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP 700-567nz

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback