Asrock B75 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics99.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '22 at 22:57
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 157
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 409
44% 347 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2242 MHz, MLim: 3751 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.8% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 112
Parallax 122
103% 120 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 110
Splatting 95.3
93% 117 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RS-120 120GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 47 32 116 150 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39% Below average
Read 231
Write 210
Mixed 204
SusWrite 91.4
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 6.3
65% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 17.4
46% 96.2 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 39%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
135GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 143 146 146 146 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 111
Write 121
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 146
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 112%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
82GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 54 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 70.2
Write 64
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 54.9
47% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
35GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 161 161 158 163 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 108
Write 83.8
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 161
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST1000NM0011 43W7629 42C0401IBM 1TB
118GB free
Firmware: BB46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 89 91 90 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 89.8
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57%
Great: 81%
Seagate ST31000524NS 43W7625 42C0400IBM 1TB
392GB free
Firmware: BB26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
64% Good
Read 108
Write 106
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 114
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
58GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 93 93 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 90.2
Write 93.4
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 93.1
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-003.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Pro3 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback