Asrock B75 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '22 at 22:26
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 162
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 452
45% 368 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 128
Parallax 116
116% 129 fps
MRender 147
Gravity 112
Splatting 95.9
94% 118 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RS-120 120GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 32 35 125 27 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.5% Average
Read 237
Write 67.4
Mixed 203
SusWrite 72.5
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 12.6
81% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 18.2
48% 98.2 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
79GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 149 149 151 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 103
Write 105
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 149
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 112%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
95GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 55 56 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 57
Write 65.2
Mixed 67
SusWrite 54.7
46% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
36GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 164 163 162 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 103
Write 72.8
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 162
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST1000NM0011 43W7629 42C0401IBM 1TB
108GB free
Firmware: BB46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 91 93 91 92 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 77.4
Write 75.2
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 91.3
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 81%
Seagate ST31000524NS 43W7625 42C0400IBM 1TB
487GB free
Firmware: BB26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 116 116 117 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 116
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
82GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 95 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 98
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 94.1
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-003.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Pro3 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback