HP EliteBook 840 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8079
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '22 at 16:08
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Memory 34.6
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 123
45% 80.7 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 174
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8079) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 5
Parallax 5.8
4% 5.4 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.3
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKGF240A5H REF 240GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LY8i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 197 202 193 196 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 314
Write 224
Mixed 258
SusWrite 196
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 23.3
78% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 168
143% 209 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B05] CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 229
17% 229 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 G3 Builds (Compare 5,637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback