Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210510
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '22 at 14:23
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 196
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 696
65% 540 Pts
64-Core 1,011
62% 1,011 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.10.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.8% Below average
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 66.8
35% 56.2 fps
MRender 58.4
Gravity 52.3
Splatting 43.4
41% 51.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 184 177 58 50 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 503
Write 436
Mixed 391
SusWrite 133
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 27.6
123% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 40.6
84% 164 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 102%
AMD T00 StoreMI 752GB
279GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 70 73 74 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 100
Write 36.1
Mixed 28
SusWrite 71.8
43% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
59% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 91%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
238GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 116 117 116 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 108
Write 123
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 116
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
209% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
94% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 32.7
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 27.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 4,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback