Dell OptiPlex 7050

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 7050
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7050  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220712
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 12 '22 at 08:08
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 29.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 185
54% 105 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 305
41% 306 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Dell(1028 07A1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 6.6
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 274 246 230 234 230 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 385
Write 341
Mixed 339
SusWrite 244
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 24.6
88% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 316
238% 320 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 97%
WDC WDS960G2G0C-00AJM0 960GB
792GB free
Firmware: 231800WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1157 377 368 371 376 364 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,309
Write 914
Mixed 967
SusWrite 502
206% 923 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 31.2
109% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 739
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 661
487% 645 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 145%
Great: 245%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
439GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 395 387 390 380 379 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 406
Write 269
Mixed 302
SusWrite 370
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 24
82% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 266
211% 293 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA851U6CJR6N-UH 80AD000080AD HMA851U6CJR6N-UH 80AD000080AD HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 80AD000080AD HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 8.8
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 258
16% 258 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7050 Builds (Compare 5,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7050

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback