Lenovo 82LT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82LT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateOct 11 '22 at 12:31
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 55.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 166
63% 111 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 589
59% 479 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1960
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 24.3
Parallax 25.7
18% 24.2 fps
MRender 19.8
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 11.5
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-4D256 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BS262
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 148 247 151 175 238 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 1,124
Write 964
Mixed 608
SusWrite 235
163% 733 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 12.3
110% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 677
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 436
342% 481 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 113%
Great: 159%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 16.3
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 14.5
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82LT Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82LT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback