TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator PH315-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH315-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCML QX50_CMS
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '22 at 11:57
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 72.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 254
80% 149 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 699
75% 598 Pts
64-Core 833
52% 833 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 82.1%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Acer(1025 1442) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1748
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 104
Parallax 107
84% 105 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 99.4
Splatting 92.2
88% 110 fps
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 85.3%
 Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1014 512GB
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11101100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1256 1002 1000 1006 714 825 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,208
Write 1,699
Mixed 1,315
SusWrite 967
294% 1,297 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 57.5
191% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,078
DQ Write 684
DQ Mixed 859
646% 873 MB/s
Poor: 116% ↑
This bench: 206%
 Great: 239%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
629GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1981 2019 1573 1483 1483 1489 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,201
Write 1,835
Mixed 1243
SusWrite 1,672
338% 1,488 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 69.7
224% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,142
DQ Write 833
DQ Mixed 937
714% 971 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑
This bench: 264%
 Great: 410%
Patriot Burst Elite 960GB
106GB free
Firmware: T0917A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 371 271 39 39 183 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 471
Write 391
Mixed 375
SusWrite 214
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 26.3
105% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 46.6
86% 167 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 73.8%
 Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMS4WEC8C2K0446FCG Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.M8FB 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.4% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 13.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 41% ↑
This bench: 45.4%
 Great: 88%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Predator PH315-53 Builds (Compare 6,112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-53

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples4,179x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples1,009x
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples861x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples3,002x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples1,146x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples811x
SSD
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 179%, 2,900 samples988x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1014 1TBWDCBench 219%, 2,501 samples632x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-256G-1014 256GBWDCBench 153%, 1,070 samples543x
RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples1,920x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 49%, 13,312 samples551x
HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN 1x16GBHynixBench 45%, 4,229 samples536x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback