Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

19 months ago, 13 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100U 24,116 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Memory 16.4 1-Core 65.9 2-Core 120 34% 67.4 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 136 22% 154 Pts	64-Core 142 9% 142 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 504A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	3.24% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 5.4 4% 4.4 fps	MRender 6.5 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.2 2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.24% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Supersonic 256GB 256GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2103XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 240 337 336 349 350 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 307 Write 280 Mixed 270 SusWrite 314 66% 293 MB/s	4K Read 9 4K Write 19.2 4K Mixed 10.9 38% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 126 91% 117 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GB 32,056 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	17% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 5.6 18% 6.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 348 12% 348 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-6100UIntelBench 43%, 24,116 samples	4x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	4x

SSD
256GB 256GBSupersonicBench 67%, 25 samples	1x
VTP128GSSD1 128GBBench 61%, 25 samples	1x

RAM
M471A5143DB0-CPB 1x4GBSamsungBench 37%, 2,600 samples	1x
HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 1x4GBHynixBench 36%, 9,725 samples	1x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16