Asus X75VD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus X75VD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X75VD
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120820
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '22 at 11:35
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Memory 76.4 1-Core 73.6 2-Core 122 56% 90.8 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 185 24% 182 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 14C7) 2.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.15% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 1 Parallax 2.7 3% 2.53 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.6 3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.15% Great: 4%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$35 17,946 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 383GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900Z13 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 349 Write 370 Mixed 324 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 25.9 89% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 186 158% 229 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 102%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB 8,748 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 37GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 265 Write 33.2 Mixed 57 106% 118 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 4.4 737% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 16.5 DQ Write 18.8 DQ Mixed 5.3 881% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 04CB AM1L16BC4R1-B1GS 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.6 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 15.2 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 87.4 46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X75VD Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X75VD

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	57x
Core i3-2370MIntel $272Bench 49%, 10,169 samples	17x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	14x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	75x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	23x
GeForce 610MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,874 samples	12x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	4x

RAM
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 26%, 5,316 samples	32x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 6GBElpidaBench 41%, 736 samples	12x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 48%, 3,420 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $105

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16