Asus X75VD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X75VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X75VD
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120820
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 10 '22 at 11:31
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 53.1
2-Core 121
50% 82 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 178
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 14C7) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.67 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$42
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900Z13
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 122
Write 65.5
Mixed 32.4
16% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 27.4
62% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 188
159% 229 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 102%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
37GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 276
Write 33.4
Mixed 56.6
109% 122 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 4.5
732% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 15.8
DQ Write 18.9
DQ Mixed 5.4
885% 13.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 04CB AM1L16BC4R1-B1GS 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.9
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X75VD Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X75VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback