Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	19.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210616
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '22 at 19:52
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	83%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 66.4 1-Core 105 2-Core 194 68% 122 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 535 58% 458 Pts	64-Core 964 60% 964 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% MSI(1462 3903) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3525 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (144 fps cap detected)	114% Outstanding	Lighting 144 Reflection 144 Parallax 144 117% 144 fps	MRender 144 Gravity 144 Splatting 140 116% 142 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 158%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 268GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1061 1012 1044 1028 1007 1031 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	269% Outstanding	Read 2,034 Write 1698 Mixed 1,305 SusWrite 1,031 339% 1,517 MB/s	4K Read 49.2 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 71.5 232% 81.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,304 DQ Write 1,081 DQ Mixed 1,168 882% 1,184 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 269% Great: 372%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX KHX3200C16D4/16GX 32GB 265 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 19.9 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 12.6 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $140Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,043x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	450x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	396x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	330x
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	313x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	256x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	89x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $108Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	86x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	77x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	103x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	97x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	93x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $638

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16