Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 HERO EVA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive417% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 HERO EVA  (all builds)
Memory118.4 GB free of 128 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '22 at 15:14
Run Duration393 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 205
2-Core 404
120% 231 Pts
4-Core 821
8-Core 1,451
137% 1,136 Pts
64-Core 2,796
173% 2,796 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
EVGA(3842 3982) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 517.48
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 320
Reflection 281
391% 300 fps
Poor: 185% Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1323 2719 3343 3243 3319 3334 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
417% Outstanding
Read 2,574
Write 3,292
Mixed 2,853
SusWrite 2880
657% 2,900 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 87.2
281% 92.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1284
DQ Write 976
DQ Mixed 1,132
846% 1,131 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 417%
Great: 528%
Nvme SHGP31-1000GM-2 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 41060C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2321 2362 2371 2089 1504 1491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
371% Outstanding
Read 2,638
Write 2,421
Mixed 1,635
SusWrite 2023
489% 2,179 MB/s
4K Read 69.1
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 87.4
288% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,352
DQ Write 1,000
DQ Mixed 1,132
858% 1,161 MB/s
Poor: 186%
This bench: 371%
Great: 397%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3054 3412 3409 3493 3661 3644 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
487% Outstanding
Read 2,683
Write 3,535
Mixed 3,153
SusWrite 3,446
727% 3,204 MB/s
4K Read 75.3
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 116
368% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,384
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 1204
901% 1,206 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 487%
Great: 528%
Seagate One Touch Hub 18TB
15TB free
Firmware: 0064
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 232 235 232 234 235 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.8% Below average
Read 239
Write 203
Mixed 155
SusWrite 233
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 0.4
40% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 3.5
DQ Write 13.6
DQ Mixed 0.3
3% 5.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 102 104 103 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 152
Write 138
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 102
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 100%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 128 126 128 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 170
Write 141
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 127
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 112%
ST325062 0NS 250GB
233GB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 55.5
Write 34.6
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 41.7
52% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
52% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-5600J3036D324x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
165% Outstanding
MC Read 63.7
MC Write 65.7
MC Mixed 64.2
184% 64.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 34.1
95% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 124%
This bench: 165%
Great: 176%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS Z690 HERO EVA Builds (Compare 243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 239%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 280%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 HERO EVA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,618
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback