Acer Aspire A317-33

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A317-33  (all builds)
MotherboardJSL Lilac_JL
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 08 '22 at 14:44
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 54.2
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 150
53% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 157
30% 206 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 150D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9079
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 5.5
4% 5.1 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$105
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 253 300 284 266 291 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 353
Write 309
Mixed 264
SusWrite 275
68% 300 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 16.1
53% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 227
183% 259 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FP 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 12.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A317-33 Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A317-33

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback